Ever fearless "Anonymous" posted a comment in reaction to my last post:
#2 expanding the landmark district?
This makes no sense. What are the historically significant buildings you want to include?
Revisit this
"The Columbia City Application Review Committee and the City of Seattle Landmarks Preservation Board are charged with maintaining the historic character of Columbia City, ensuring that the architectural integrity and aesthetics of the buildings and landscape are preserved."
Yes, yes, ok, technically you're correct. If I was going for historically appropriate buildings (or even just more age-appropriate buildings) I suppose I would have suggested areas even further south, perhaps near Orcas. However, the basic point I was making is simple: the landmark district, from a business point of view, is a raging success. We should be encouraging further business development and revival along Rainier Ave further south, not encouraging the business zone to "widen" into the neighborhood. Ideally the business development aspects should be completely separate from the landmark district preservation efforts, but unfortunately they're closely intertwined in Columbia City.
The problem arises because the Columbia City Business Association only encourages business within the landmark district. See this proposal for an example of how they think -
It has been a key goal of the Columbia City Business Association to "widen" the district by promoting commercial activity up the commercially-zoned side streets, east and west of Rainier Avenue. The existing historic-style pedestrian lighting is very important in defining the business district and supporting its landmark status.
So if the only way to get the support of the business association for more development along Rainier (as opposed to moving into the residential areas) is to enlarge the landmark district, then so be it.
Anonymous also made the point of density (which yes, Seattle desperately needs more of) and a strategy for businesses along the light rail line so whatever develops there doesn't cannibalize Columbia City. So far, judging from the development that's taking place near MLK & Alaska, we're getting the residential density without any extra commercial zoning, which is perfect. But I wonder if the business association has a plan for how to link the light rail stop with Columbia City?
Perhaps, if they're really really intent on turning residential areas commercial, they could work on having Alaska between Rainier and MLK zoned commercial and added to the landmark district? I'd love to see shops from Lucille all the way up Rainier to Alaska, and from there to the light rail stop. I'm sure all the people moving into those developments along MLK would like that too.